[Numpy-discussion] Procedure for doing documentation reviews

David Goldsmith d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Sun Oct 25 20:16:44 CDT 2009

Technically, after "Needs Review," it's supposed to go through "Needs Work
(Reviewed)"  The "by the book" way to do it would be to:

0 & 1) Provide comments in the Discussion section and change status to
"Needs Work (Reviewed)" (in either order);

2) Edit, if inclined.

3) Answer your own comments as a record of what you've done;

4) At the end of all this, if you feel it's ready for review again, change
status to "Needs Review (Revised)."



On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Christopher Burns <cburns@berkeley.edu>wrote:

> When a documents status is "Needs Review" and when reviewing it we
> feel it needs edits, should we add comments regarding the edits, or
> should we feel free to edit it directly?
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20091025/e526c3b5/attachment.html 

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list