[Numpy-discussion] Bug in logaddexp2.reduce
Charles R Harris
Thu Apr 1 22:01:36 CDT 2010
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Charles R Harris
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:59 PM, David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
>> Anne Archibald wrote:
>> > First I guess we should check which systems don't have log1p
>> This is already done - we do use the system log1p on linux (but note
>> that log2_1p is not standard AFAIK). I would guess few systems outside
>> windows don't have log1p, given that msun has an implementation,
> I see that msun uses the same series I came to. However, my rational (Pade)
> approximation is a lot better than their polynomial.
In fact I get better than 119 bits using the same range as sun and the ratio
of two 7'th degree polynomials. I suspect it's better than that, but I only
have mpmath set to that precision. Sun got 58 bits with a 14'th degree
polynomial. So we can definitely improve on sun.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion