[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions
David Goldsmith
d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Fri Feb 12 15:24:02 CST 2010
OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over. We ask people who
are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev; this is
not the same thing as being an "innocent bystander" asking a question or
making a comment - I retract the request.
Now, does anyone have anything useful to say about OP's original second
problem?
DG
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:58, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:42, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith <
> d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith <
> d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post docstring
> "complaints"
> >>>>>> > at
> >>>>>> > scipy-dev (numpy-discussion has many more subscribers, many of
> whom
> >>>>>> > probably
> >>>>>> > don't immediately care about any particular docstring problem,
> whereas
> >>>>>> > anyone who is working on the docstrings is - hopefully -
> subscribed to
> >>>>>> > scipy-dev); thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> numpy docstrings get discussed on numpy-discussion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then is it just the Wiki and related issues that we ask people to
> discuss @
> >>>>> scipy-dev?
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see a reason to do that, either.
> >>>
> >>> doceditor not moin Wiki, that was the policy that Ralf and David
> >>> followed since last summer to have all docediting questions in one
> >>> place.
> >>
> >> Is the volume of questions really so large to justify the
> >> inconvenience to the questioners? It's one thing to direct someone to,
> >> say, the matplotlib list when asking matplotlib questions, but no one
> >> is going to guess that they need to go to scipy-dev to ask a question
> >> about the doceditor when they run into a problem editing a numpy
> >> docstring.
> >
> > No, I agree with you, short questions can be answered wherever they
> > happen, especially if they are on topic.
> >
> > But, if it turns into a discussion about the internal structure of how
> > doc strings are generated, then maybe David can redirect the traffic.
>
> I just don't see the reason for all that hassle, and it is a
> substantial hassle. You redirect people in order to get their question
> in front of the audience that can help them best or for truly
> off-topic discussions. As far as I'm concerned, questions about the
> doceditor, which drives the documentation for both numpy and scipy,
> are on-topic for any of either of the projects' lists. You don't
> redirect people just to keep things tidy. Mailing lists are messy
> things no matter what you do.
>
> --
> Robert Kern
>
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
> -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100212/fa288004/attachment.html
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list