[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions
Fri Feb 12 22:01:52 CST 2010
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is
> invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for
> the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not
> The methods' docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the
> corresponding function docstrings are created.
Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it
just confined to ma)? Scott's statement appears to imply that he thought
there was no problem at all.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion