[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions

David Goldsmith d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Fri Feb 12 22:01:52 CST 2010

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevlist@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is
> invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for
> the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not
> followed?
> The methods'  docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the
> corresponding function docstrings are created.

Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it
just confined to ma)?  Scott's statement appears to imply that he thought
there was no problem at all.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100212/2cd985c8/attachment.html 

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list