[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions
Sat Feb 13 21:31:13 CST 2010
On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not followed?
> The methods' docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the corresponding function docstrings are created.
> Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it just confined to ma)?
Likely to be just a numpy.ma issue. I'll try to find some kind of fix.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion