[Numpy-discussion] random.uniform documentation bug?
Tue Feb 23 12:29:29 CST 2010
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:21, Alan G Isaac <email@example.com> wrote:
> This behavior does not match the current documentation.
> I assume this behavior is intentional and it is
> the documentation that is in error (for the case
> when high<=low)?
Well, the documentation just doesn't really address high<=low. In any
case, the claim that the results are in [low, high) is wrong thanks to
floating point arithmetic. It has exactly the same issues as the
standard library's random.uniform() and should be updated to reflect
Return a random floating point number N such that a <= N <= b for a
<= b and b <= N <= a for b < a.
The end-point value b may or may not be included in the range
depending on floating-point rounding in the equation a + (b-a) *
We should address the high < low case in the documentation because
we're not going to bother raising an exception when high < low.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion