[Numpy-discussion] BOF notes: Fernando's proposal: NumPy ndarray with named axes

Keith Goodman kwgoodman@gmail....
Tue Jul 6 11:56:47 CDT 2010

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Joshua Holbrook <josh.holbrook@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Skipper Seabold <jsseabold@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Holbrook
>> <josh.holbrook@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm kinda-sorta still getting around to building/reading the sphinx
>>> docs for datarray. <_< Like, I've gone through them before, but it was
>>> more cursory than I'd like. Honestly, I kinda let myself get caught up
>>> in trying to automate the process of getting them onto github pages.
>>> I have to admit that I didn't 100% understand the reasoning behind not
>>> allowing integer ticks (I blame jet lag--it's a nice scapegoat). I
>>> believe it originally had to do with what you meant if you typed, say,
>>> A[3:"london"]; Did you mean the underlying ndarray index 3, or the
>>> outer level "tick" 3? I think if you didn't allow integers, then you
>>> could simply wrap your "3" in a string: A["3":"London"] so it's
>>> probably not a deal-breaker, but I would imagine that using (a)
>>> separate method(s) for label-based indexing may make allowing
>>> integer-datatyped labels.
>>> Thoughts?
>> Would you mind bottom-posting/ posting in-line to make the thread
>> easier to follow?
>>> --Josh
>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Keith Goodman <kwgoodman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Skipper Seabold <jsseabold@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Keith Goodman <kwgoodman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Joshua Holbrook <josh.holbrook@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I really really really want to work on this. I already forked datarray
>>>>>>> on github and did some research on What Other People Have Done (
>>>>>>> http://jesusabdullah.github.com/2010/07/02/datarray.html ). With any
>>>>>>> luck I'll contribute something actually useful. :)
>>>>>> I like the figure!
>>>>>> To do label indexing on a larry you need to use lix, so lar.lix[...]
>>>>> FYI, if you didn't see it, there are also usage docs in dataarray/doc
>>>>> that you can build with sphinx that show a lot of the thinking and
>>>>> examples (they spent time looking at pandas and larry).
>>>>> One question that was asked of Wes, that I'd propose to you as well
>>>>> Keith, is that if DataArray became part of NumPy, do you think you
>>>>> could use it to work on top of for larry?
>>>> This is all very exciting. I did not know that DataArray had ticks so
>>>> I never took a close look at it.
>>>> After reading the sphinx doc, one question I had was how firm is the
>>>> decision to not allow integer ticks? I use int ticks a lot.
>> I think what Josh said is right.  However, we proposed having all of
>> the new labeled axis access pushed to a .aix (or whatever) method, so
>> as to avoid any confusion, as the original object can be accessed just
>> as an ndarray.  I'm not sure where this leaves us vis-a-vis ints as
>> ticks.
>> Skipper
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> Sorry re: posting at-top. I guess habit surpassed observation of
> community norms for a second there. Whups!
> My opinion on the matter is that, as a matter of "purity," labels
> should all have the string datatype. That said, I'd imagine that
> passing an int as an argument would be fine, due to python's
> loosey-goosey attitude towards datatypes. :) That, or, y'know,
> str(myint).

Ideally (for me), the only requirement for ticks would be hashable and
unique along any one axis. So, for example, datetime.date() could be a
tick but a list could not be a tick (not hashable).

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list