[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Nanny, faster NaN functions
Mon Nov 22 02:46:13 CST 2010
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Wes McKinney wrote:
> Maybe let's have the next thread on SciPy-user-- I think what we're
> talking about is general enough to be discussed there.
Yes, a lot of this is of general interest.
I'd be particularly interested in having the NaN work land in scipy. They
are many places where it would be useful (I understand that it would
require more work).
More information about the NumPy-Discussion