[Numpy-discussion] odd performance of sum?
eat
e.antero.tammi@gmail....
Thu Feb 10 14:38:52 CST 2011
Hi Pauli,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
> Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:16:12 -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
> [clip]
> > One thing that might be worthwhile is to make
> > implementations of sum() and cumsum() that avoid the ufunc machinery and
> > do their iterations more quickly, at least for some common combinations
> > of dtype and contiguity.
>
> I wonder what is the balance between the iterator overhead and the time
> taken in the reduction inner loop. This should be straightforward to
> benchmark.
>
> Apparently, some overhead decreased with the new iterators, since current
> Numpy master outperforms 1.5.1 by a factor of 2 for this benchmark:
>
> In [8]: %timeit M.sum(1) # Numpy 1.5.1
> 10 loops, best of 3: 85 ms per loop
>
> In [8]: %timeit M.sum(1) # Numpy master
> 10 loops, best of 3: 49.5 ms per loop
>
> I don't think this is explainable by the new memory layout optimizations,
> since M is C-contiguous.
>
> Perhaps there would be room for more optimization, even within the ufunc
> framework?
I hope so. Please suggest if there's anything that I can do to further
advance this. (My C skills are allready bit rusty, but at any higher level
I'll try my best to contribute).
Thanks,
eat
>
> --
> Pauli Virtanen
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110210/58f47d18/attachment.html
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list