[Numpy-discussion] New functions.
Thu Jun 2 04:17:54 CDT 2011
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:42 PM, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:35 PM, David Cournapeau <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Not quite. Bincount is fine if you have a set of approximately
>>> sequential numbers. But if you don't....
>> Even worse, it fails miserably if you sequential numbers but with a high shift.
>> np.bincount([100000001, 100000002]) # will take a lof of memory
>> Doing bincount with dict is faster in those cases.
> same with negative numbers, but in these cases I just subtract the min
> and we are back to the fast bincount case
Indeed, you can also deal with large numbers which are not consecutive
by using a lookup-table. All those methods are quite error-prone in
general, and reallly, there is no reason why bincount could not handle
the general case,
More information about the NumPy-Discussion