[Numpy-discussion] tighten up ufunc casting rule

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Sun Jun 5 17:41:26 CDT 2011

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:43:45PM +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >    four in scikit-learn (plus two that don't
> >    look related),
> Yeah, some of these failures are due to numerical unstabilities in tests
> (nasty ones, still fighting) and some simply to crappy code (HMMs are
> hopeless :( ).
> Now, with regards to the actual failures induced by the new branch, it
> took me a while to understand why they where happening, and now I realise
> that we probably should have explicit coercions at these locations.
So the failures in those cases is a good thing?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110605/89ef3e4a/attachment.html 

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list