[Numpy-discussion] feedback request: proposal to add masks to the core ndarray
Fri Jun 24 19:56:58 CDT 2011
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Charles R Harris <email@example.com
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Matthew Brett <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Benjamin Root <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Again, there are pros and cons either way and I see them very orthogonal
>> > complementary.
>> That may be true, but I imagine only one of them will be implemented.
>> @Mark - I don't have a clear idea whether you consider the nafloat64
>> option to be still in play as the first thing to be implemented
>> (before array.mask). If it is, what kind of thing would persuade you
>> either way?
> Mark can speak for himself, but I think things are tending towards masks.
> They have the advantage of one implementation for all data types, current
> and future, and they are more flexible since the masked data can be actual
> valid data that you just choose to ignore for experimental reasons.
These are all things I like about it too.
> What might be helpful is a routine to import/export R files, but that
> shouldn't be to difficult to implement.
There is another intern here who has started something along these lines.
I'll tell him he should email the list too. ;)
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion