[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule
Mon Mar 7 11:08:24 CST 2011
On 3/6/11 5:54 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> I suppose this might cause a problem with lazy/quick c extensions that
> expected elements in a certain order, so some breakage could occur.
(I've gotten a bit confused about this thread, but if this is about the
question of whether structured dtypes are dtypes are assumed to always
keep order, read on -- otherwise, ignore)..
I have always assumed a structured dtype was much like a C struct: i.e.
arrangement in memory is fixed, and the named fields are just for
I was very surprised to learn that they could ever be used in more a a
Also, I noted a recent post to this list suggesting that folks sometime
miss-use stuctured arrays (particularly folks coming from MATLAB, etc),
by using them when what they really want is a dict. In that post, the
poster suggested that the primary use of structured arrays was for
interacting with data files and C code that has arrays of structures,
and indeed, that is how I have primarily used them.
So I think for performance and consistency with C code, keeping dtype
order is the best way to go. If that breaks backward compatibility too
much, then it shouldn't be changed, but I think it better reflects what
dtypes are all about.
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
More information about the NumPy-Discussion