[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule

Robert Kern robert.kern@gmail....
Mon Mar 7 11:23:33 CST 2011

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:08, Christopher Barker <Chris.Barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
> On 3/6/11 5:54 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> I suppose this might cause a problem with lazy/quick c extensions that
>> expected elements in a certain order, so some breakage could occur.
> absolutely!
> (I've gotten a bit confused about this thread, but if this is about the
> question of whether structured dtypes are dtypes are assumed to always
> keep order, read on -- otherwise, ignore)..

Can someone explain exactly what changed? Or point to the changeset
that made it? It's not clear to me what operations are different under
Mark's changes.

Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list