[Numpy-discussion] memory layout, K vs C order (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)
Fri Mar 11 03:13:05 CST 2011
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Ufuncs don't necessarily return arrays in C-order, but instead
> try to keep the memory layout of the original if it seems
> advantageous vs. memory access.
> (200, 40, 8)
> (40, 8, 200)
> This gets +1 from me; the drawbacks to this are mostly in code that
> makes too much assumptions and makes no checks.
My conclusion of this discussion was that it can be left as-is. If an
issue turns up during testing of the 1.6.0 beta it can still be
More information about the NumPy-Discussion