[Numpy-discussion] broadcasting behavior for 1.6 (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Fri Mar 11 10:40:32 CST 2011

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Travis Oliphant <oliphant@enthought.com>wrote:

> This discussion is interesting and useful for NumPy 2.0, but the subtle
> change is not acceptable for NumPy 1.6.
> The rules were consistent, even if seen as unintuitive by some.
> The fact that two libraries we know of already had tests break should be a
> big red warning flag.  There are a lot of other libraries that may have
> tests break.
> Having to fix tests would be expected for NumPy 2.0, but not 1.6.
> I am a big -10 for rolling out a change like this in NumPy 1.6
> For NumPy 2.0, the discussion is interesting, but I am still a -0
Out of curiosity, what do you see as the essential use case for this



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110311/4568bab8/attachment.html 

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list