[Numpy-discussion] consensus (was: NA masks in the next numpy release?)
Charles R Harris
Fri Oct 28 17:49:11 CDT 2011
2011/10/28 Stéfan van der Walt <email@example.com>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Root <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > The space issues was never ignored and Mark left room for that to be
> > addressed. Parameterized dtypes can still be added (and isn't all that
> > different from multi-na). Perhaps I could be convinced of a having np.MA
> > assignments mean "ignore" and np.NA mean "absent". How far off are we
> > really from consensus?
> Do you know whether Mark is around? I think his feedback would be
> useful at this point; having written the code, he'll be able to
> evaluate some of the technical suggestions made.
Yes, Mark is around, but I assume he is interested in his school work at
this point. And he might not be inclined to get back into this particular
discussion. I don't feel he was treated very well by some last time around.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion