[Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release
Mon Dec 17 01:11:17 CST 2012
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Nathaniel Smith <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2012 23:01, "Charles R Harris" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ondřej Čertík <email@example.com>
> >> Thanks Ralf and Nathan,
> >> I have put high priority on the issues that need to be fixed before the
> >> There are now 4 issues:
> >> I am working on the mingw one, as that one is the most difficult.
> >> Ralf (or anyone else), do you know how to fix this one:
> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/438
> >> I am not very familiar with this part of numpy, so maybe you know how
> >> to document it well.
> >> The sooner we can fix these 4 issues, the sooner we can release.
> > I believe mingw was updated last month to a new compiler version. I
> don't know what other changes there were, but it is possible that some
> problems have been fixed.
> It'd be worth checking in case it allows us to get off the (incredibly
> old) GCC that we currently require on windows. But that's a long-term
> problem that we probably shouldn't be messing with for 1.7 purposes. afaict
> all we need to do for 1.7 is switch to using our current POSIX code on
> win32 as well, instead of the (weird and broken) MS-specific API that we're
> currently using. (Plus suppress some totally spurious warnings):
> (Or I could be missing something, but I don't think any problems with that
> solution have been discussed on the list anyway.)
AFAICT Nathaniel's suggestion in the thread linked above is the way to go.
Trying again to go to gcc 4.x doesn't sound like a good idea. Probably
David C. already has a good idea about whether recent changes to MinGW have
made a difference to the issue he ran into about a year ago.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion