[Numpy-discussion] datetime64 format parameter?
Mon Feb 6 16:01:39 CST 2012
That makes sense.
I figured that ambiguity was the reason it was removed.
Thank you for the explanation. I'm a big fan of your work.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mark Wiebe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hey John,
> NumPy doesn't provide this, because it's already provided by the
> datetime.date.strftime function in Python:
> One reason this format isn't supported automatically is that parsing
> "MM/dd/YY" is inherently ambiguous, and the convention is different in
> different parts of the world. The date "01/02/03" could be January 2nd 2003
> or February 3rd, 2001, for example. The datetime constructor follows the
> ISO 8601 standard for date and time formatting, which is unambiguous. This
> was specified in the datetime NEP, but the 1.6 implementation unfortunately
> hadn't followed that part of the spec.
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, John Salvatier <email@example.com
> > wrote:
>> Is there a way to specify a format for the datetime64 constructor? The
>> constructor doesn't have a doc. I have dates in a file with the format
>> "MM/dd/YY". datetime64 used to be able to parse these in 1.6.1 but the dev
>> version throws an error.
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion