[Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7
Nathaniel Smith
njs@pobox....
Sun Jul 15 10:57:13 CDT 2012
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant <travis@continuum.io>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
>> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them
>> as soon as possible.
>>
>> I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UTC on July 18th (7:00pm CDT on
>> July 17th). This will allow the creation of beta releases of NumPy on the
>> 18th of July. This is a few days later than originally hoped for --- largely
>> due to unexpected travel schedules of Ondrej and I, but it does give people
>> a few more days to get patches in. Of course, we will be able to apply
>> bug-fixes to the 1.7.x branch once the tag is made.
>
>
> What about the tickets still open for 1.7.0
> (http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/report/3)? There are a few important ones
> left.
>
> These I would consider blockers:
> - #2108 Datetime failures with MinGW
Is there a description anywhere of what the problem actually is here?
I looked at the ticket, which referred to a PR, and it's hard to work
out from the PR discussion what the actual remaining test failures are
-- and there definitely doesn't seem to be any description of the
underlying problem. (Something about working 64-bit time_t on windows
being difficult depending on the compiler used?)
> - #2076 Bus error for F order ndarray creation on SPARC
Yes, this looks like a regression... Mark, any thoughts?
> These have patches available which should be reviewed:
> - #2150 Distutils should support Debian multi-arch fully
This PR still needs tests and has unresolved comments, but is probably
a blocker:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/327
-N
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list