[Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7
Sun Jul 15 21:52:44 CDT 2012
there is a PR that I think could be merged before the relase:
It is the addition of the inplace_increment function. It seam good,
but I can't review it enough as it use many numpy internal that I
never used or looked at. But the tests seam to cover all cases and it
don't change current functions. So it should not have any side effect
This was a feature frequently requested.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Travis Oliphant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Bump for: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/351
>> As requested by njsmith, I gave a more detailed explanation and asked
>> the list for input at:
>> There was one qualified negative reply and nothing (yet) further. I'd
>> appreciate if some other devs could weigh in.
> I can see the point of your proposal, but I don't think we can just change the behavior of genfromtxt quite like this. I'm not an expert on the genfromtxt code, so I don't know if I exactly understand what is changing and what is staying the same.
> >From the look of the patch, it looks like you are changing the interpretation so that whereas headers used to be allowed in the "first-line" of the comment, they would no longer be allowed like that. I don't think we can do that, because it breaks code for someone without a path for change.
> Now, we could add another keyword (headers=True, for example), that interpreted the first non-commented line as the header line. Something like that has a much higher chance of getting accepted from my perspective.
>> Paul Natsuo Kishimoto
>> SM candidate, Technology & Policy Program (2012)
>> Research assistant, http://globalchange.mit.edu
>> https://paul.kishimoto.name +1 617 302 6105
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
More information about the NumPy-Discussion