[Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch
Tue Jun 26 11:52:11 CDT 2012
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Cournapeau <email@example.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
> >> include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best
> >> The result was a delay of several months until Ralf could get up to
> >> and get 1.4.1 out. Let us also note that poly1d is actually not the
> same as
> >> Matlab poly1d.
> >> This is not accurate, Charles. Please stop trying to dredge up old
> >> history you don't know the full story about and are trying to create an
> >> alternate reality about. It doesn't help anything and is quite
> >> to this mailing list.
> > I didn't start the discussion of 1.4, nor did I raise the issue at the
> > as I didn't think it would be productive. We moved forward. But in any
> > I asked David at the time why the datetime stuff got included. I'd
> > your version if you care to offer it. That would be more useful than
> > accusing me of creating an alternative reality and would clear the air.
> > The datetime stuff got included because it is a very useful and important
> > feature for multiple users. It still needed work, but it was in a state
> > where it could be tried. It did require breaking ABI compatibility in
> > state it was in. My approach was to break ABI compatibility and move
> > forward (there were other things we could do at the time that are still
> > needed in the code base that will break ABI compatibility in the future).
> > David didn't want to break ABI compatibility and so tried to satisfy two
> > competing desires in a way that did not ultimately work. These things
> > happen. We all get to share responsibility for the outcome.
> I think Chuck alludes to the fact that I was rather reserved about
> merging datetime before *anyone* knew about breaking the ABI. I don't
> feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
> more strongly about datetime being included), but I am also not
> interested in making a big deal out of it, certainly not two years
> after the fact. I am merely point this out so that you realize that
> you may both have a different view that could be seen as valid
> depending on what you are willing to highlight.
> I suggest that Chuck and you take this off-list,
Or, we could raise funds for NumFOCUS by selling tickets for a brawl
between the two at SciPy2012...
I kid, I kid!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion