[Numpy-discussion] Missing data again
Wed Mar 7 15:35:12 CST 2012
On 03/07/2012 11:15 AM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Le 07/03/2012 20:57, Eric Firing a écrit :
>> In other words, good low-level support for numpy.ma functionality?
> Coming back to *existing* ma support, I was just wondering whether it
> was now possible to "np.save" a masked array.
> (I'm using numpy 1.5)
No, not with the mask preserved. This is one of the improvements I am
hoping for with the upcoming missing data work.
> In the end, this is the most annoying problem I have with the existing
> ma module which otherwise is pretty useful to me. I'm happy not to need
> to process 100% of my data though.
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
More information about the NumPy-Discussion