[Numpy-discussion] label NA and datetime as experimental

Richard Hattersley rhattersley@gmail....
Mon Mar 26 03:29:20 CDT 2012


My team are currently experimenting with extending datetime to allow
alternative, non-physical calendars (e.g. 360-day used by climate
modellers). Once we've got a handle on the options we'd like to
propose the extensions/changes back to NumPy. Obviously we'd like to
avoid wasted effort, so are there some aspects of datetime64 which are
more experimental than others? Is there a summary of unresolved issues
and/or plans for change?

Richard Hattersley

On 25 March 2012 13:57, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> We decided to label both NA and datetime APIs as experimental for the 1.7.0
> release. I made a PR that does this, please review:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/240
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list