[Numpy-discussion] testing with amd libm/acml
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Thu Nov 8 11:38:47 CST 2012
On 11/08/2012 06:06 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> On 11/8/12 1:41 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 08:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Would you expect numexpr without MKL to give a significant boost?
>> If you need higher performance than what numexpr can give without using
>> MKL, you could look at code such as this:
> Hey, that's cool. I was a bit disappointed not finding this sort of
> work in open space. It seems that this lacks threading support, but
> that should be easy to implement by using OpenMP directives.
IMO this is the wrong place to introduce threading; each thread should
call expd_v on its chunks. (Which I think is how you said numexpr
currently uses VML anyway.)
More information about the NumPy-Discussion