[Numpy-discussion] Contiguity of result of astype changed - intentional?

Travis Oliphant travis@continuum...
Wed Sep 12 15:27:19 CDT 2012

>>> Is this intended?  Is there a performance reason to keep the same
>>> strides in 1.7.0?
>> I believe that this could be because in 1.7.0, NumPy was changed so that copying does not always default to "C-order" but to "Keep-order".    So, in 1.7.0, the strides of b is governed by the strides of a, while in 1.6.1, the strides of b is C-order (because of the copy).
> Thanks for the reply.
> So maybe the bottom line is that the user should not assume any
> contiguity from ``astype``?   If that's the case I'll submit a
> docstring PR to say that.

Yes, that would be a great addition to the docstring.   Mark, can you confirm this is the desired behavior?  Ondrej, this would be something to put in the release notes, if it isn't already.



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list