[Numpy-discussion] OpenOpt Suite release 0.45
Nathaniel Smith
njs@pobox....
Wed Apr 10 02:36:49 CDT 2013
On 10 Apr 2013 08:01, "Dmitrey" <tmp50@ukr.net> wrote:
>
> --- Исходное сообщение ---
> От кого: "Robert Kern" <robert.kern@gmail.com>
> Дата: 9 апреля 2013, 14:29:43
>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Dmitrey <tmp50@ukr.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > --- Исходное сообщение ---
>> > От кого: "Robert Kern" <robert.kern@gmail.com>
>> > Дата: 16 марта 2013, 22:15:07
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dmitrey <tmp50@ukr.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --- Исходное сообщение ---
>> >> От кого: "Robert Kern" <robert.kern@gmail.com>
>> >> Дата: 16 марта 2013, 19:54:51
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Matthieu Brucher
>> >> <matthieu.brucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Even if they have different hashes, they can be stored in the same
>> >>> underlying list before they are retrieved. Then, an actual
comparison is
>> >>> done to check if the given key (i.e. object instance, not hash) is
the
>> >>> same
>> >>> as one of the stored keys.
>> >>
>> >> Right. And the rule is that if two objects compare equal, then they
>> >> must also hash equal. Unfortunately, it looks like `oofun` objects do
>> >> not obey this property. oofun.__eq__() seems to return a Constraint
>> >> rather than a bool, so oofun objects should simply not be used as
>> >> dictionary keys.
>> >>
>> >> It is one of several base features FuncDesigner is build on and is
used
>> >> extremely often and wide; then whole FuncDesigner would work
incorrectly
>> >> while it is used intensively and solves many problems better than its
>> >> competitors.
>> >
>> > I understand. It just means that you can't oofun objects as dictionary
>> > keys. Adding a __hash__() method is not enough to make that work.
>> >
>> > No, it just means I had mapped, have mapped, map and will map oofun
objects
>> > as Python dict keys.
>>
>> Well, it's your software. You are free to make it as buggy as you wish,
I guess.
>
> Yes, and that's why each time I get a bugreport I immediately start
working on it, so usually I have zero opened bugs, as now . It somewhat
differs from your bugtracker , that has tens of opened bugs, and ~ half of
them are hanging for years (also, half of them are mentioned as high and
highest priority) . But it's definitely your right to keep it as buggy as
you wish, as well!
This kind of personal attack is never appropriate for this list. Please
stop.
-n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130410/d59ef1cd/attachment.html
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list