[Numpy-discussion] About ready to start 1.8 release process.
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
Mon Aug 12 18:16:21 CDT 2013
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Charles R Harris
>> > Datetime64 will not be modified in this release.
>> I now there is neither the time nor the will for all that it needs,
>> but please, please, please, can we yank out the broken timezone
>> handling at least?
> You need to be a bit more specific, what parts should be yanked out?
It's pretty well discussed in issue 3290 -- but what I'm suggesting is
essentially to ignore time zones completely -- i.e. make the
datetime64 "naive" with respect to time zones.
In fact, it already is -- the only timezone handling it has is that if
it parses an ISO string and no timezone is specified, it applies the
Locale time zone -- this is pretty broken behavior. At the moment, I
can't recall what it does with a datetime.datetime instance, but it's
not quite consitent with what it does parsing string.
I _think_ the only point of contention in that issue 3290 discussion
is how datetime64 should parse and ISO string that provides an offset:
1) ignore it -- probably a bad idea
2) raise an error -- you can't do it.
3) apply the offset so that the resulting datetime64 is assumed to be UTC.
Personally, I think (2) is the way to go, with the possible addition
of allowing zero offset, 'cause, why not?
> also worried about breaking peoples' work arounds this late in the game.
well, that is an issue -- though I think most work-arounds will not be
broken, and the discussion about this didn't reveal a single user that
actually used the "use the Locale time zone" feature -- granted,
people contributing to the discussion is a pretty small subset of
But in 1.7 datetime64 is officially experimental, and keeping a broken
implementation around longer will only make for more broken code
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
More information about the NumPy-Discussion