[Numpy-discussion] New numpy functions: filled, filled_like
josef.pktd@gmai...
josef.pktd@gmai...
Sun Jan 13 11:44:11 CST 2013
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> PR 2875 adds two new functions, that generalize zeros(), ones(),
> zeros_like(), ones_like(), by simply taking an arbitrary fill value:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2875
> So
> np.ones((10, 10))
> is the same as
> np.filled((10, 10), 1)
>
> The implementations are trivial, but the API seems useful because it
> provides an idiomatic way of efficiently creating an array full of
> inf, or nan, or None, whatever funny value you need. All the
> alternatives are either inefficient (np.ones(...) * np.inf) or
> cumbersome (a = np.empty(...); a.fill(...)). Or so it seems to me. But
> there's a question of taste here; one could argue instead that these
> just add more clutter to the numpy namespace. So, before we merge,
> anyone want to chime in?
+1
I find it useful.
I do the indirect way very often, or write matlab style helper functions.
def nanes: ....
problem dtype: inf and nan only makes sense for float
I don't think I used many besides those two.
>
> (Bonus, extra bike-sheddy survey: do people prefer
> np.filled((10, 10), np.nan)
> np.filled_like(my_arr, np.nan)
+ 0.5
> or
> np.filled(np.nan, (10, 10))
> np.filled_like(np.nan, my_arr)
> ?)
Josef
>
> -n
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list