[Numpy-discussion] Numpy deprecation schedule
Wed Mar 6 16:53:13 CST 2013
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Nathaniel Smith <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> A number of items on the 1.8 todo list are reminders to remove things
>>> that we deprecated in 1.7, and said we would remove in 1.8, e.g.:
>>> But, since 1.8 is so soon after 1.7, we probably shouldn't actually do that.
>>> I suggest we switch to a time-based deprecation schedule, where
>>> instead of saying "this will be removed in N releases" we say "this
>>> will be removed in the first release on or after (now+N months)".
>> We can always delay removal if a particular release comes sooner than
>> originally expected. The deprecation policy is just that we specify
>> minimum version numbers at which the features can be removed. It's not
>> really a firm schedule.
>> I do take your suggestion to heart, though. We shouldn't remove stuff
>> faster than 12 months or so. I just think that it should modify our
>> release process, not our "marking for deprecation" process.
> I'm not sure what this means in practical terms, though? Take the
> stuff deprecated in 1.7, released 2013-02-10. From here it seems
> plausible that the first release after 2014-02-10 could be 1.9, 1.10,
> or even, if we end up really embracing the small-quick-release cycle,
> 1.11. So which should we write down as our expected version number for
> the 1.7 deprecations?
If. I would leave the policy alone until we consistently implement
such a release cycle that makes it regularly problematic.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion