[SciPy-dev] poll for renaming scipy_core online
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Sat Jan 7 21:32:41 CST 2006
Stefan van der Walt wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:26:20PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>Doh... Weave *was* working, but I changed the C-API a couple of
>>>iterations ago for consistency and this function is called something
>>>else. This is an example of why I'm uncomfortable with it in the core:
>>>it's just not on my radar...
>>Putting even something as simple as
>>weave.inline('std::cout << "hello\\n";')
>>and other one-liners like
>>weave.blitz('x+1;') # this doesn't work either
>What is needed here exactly? If you only want the weave examples
>updated/fixed, I can take a look at it this coming week. That being
>said, I am not familiar with the current code, but I'm willing to give
>it a go.
I think Fernando is suggesting some unit tests for weave that actually
try to run and use some of the examples.
This is a good idea... But, note that weave is now in SciPy (not NumPy).
More information about the Scipy-dev