[SciPy-dev] License review / weave bsd-ification

David Cournapeau cournape@gmail....
Mon Nov 3 04:09:50 CST 2008

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Benny Malengier
<benny.malengier@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with you.
> I just mean, if the license issue can be resolved, weave is a worthwhile
> part to have inside of scipy.

Sure. I mentioned scikits because one of the reason it exists in the
first place is licensing issues. It looks like if someone is willing
to port the newer random code to blitz template mechanism, the license
issue can be solved.



More information about the Scipy-dev mailing list