[SciPy-dev] the state of scipy unit tests
Mon Nov 24 03:43:16 CST 2008
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Nathan Bell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Passing 'nosetests scipy' should be the standard for modifications to
> scipy. It should be as comprehensive as possible while running in ~60
> seconds. We can have an additional suite of 'slow' tests for
> releases, build bots, and paranoid developers.
I completely agree. And it would be fairly easy to do with out much
work, which is a big plus.
Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs
10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
More information about the Scipy-dev