[SciPy-dev] The future of SciPy and its development infrastructure

Travis E. Oliphant oliphant@enthought....
Thu Feb 26 17:52:09 CST 2009

Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:58:03 -0600, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> [clip]
> Anyway, difficult to tell how a mandatory review policy would affect 
> Scipy's development. I'd be reluctant to jump headfirst to requiring it, 
> without experimenting, even if Sage and Sympy have had good experience 
> about it. Nevertheless, I'm going to try to change my own workflow and 
> see what happens.
I'm willing to do this as well.    I love seeing the enthusiasm behind 
getting a description of how to contribute to SciPy up on the wiki and 
the effort put in to testing DVCS.   That alone is worth encouraging if 
I can by switching my own workflow.


More information about the Scipy-dev mailing list