[SciPy-dev] fix for ncx2 bug?
Thu Jun 18 06:16:28 CDT 2009
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Neal Becker<email@example.com> wrote:
>> How about the boost reference? This is an existence proof of code that
>> is supposed to be good quality. Refer to non_central_chi_squared_cdf in
> R's implementations of statistical functions may also a good
> reference; certainly they've been pounded on by more real
> statisticians than anything in scipy or boost. Also nice is that they
> always include citations in their help files -- just type
> help("pchisq") in R.
R may be good too - I'm not familiar with it.
The boost ref has extensive test results including comparison against R.
More information about the Scipy-dev