[SciPy-dev] contributing a CHOLMOD wrapper

James Bergstra james.bergstra@gmail....
Wed Nov 4 15:42:43 CST 2009

There is also a cholmod wrapper in cvxopt.  Not sure what the license
on that is... or what it has to do with scipy exactly.  Just fyi.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 15:28, Gael Varoquaux
> <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:25:12PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> CHOLMOD is GPLed, so I suppose my wrapper must be as well, and is thus
>>> unsuitable for inclusion in Scipy proper -- though scipy.sparse
>>> already has a wrapper for the GPLed UMFPACK, so I guess I might be
>>> wrong?
> No, you're right. The UMFPACK support there has always been optional.
> However, we don't want to add more optional components into scipy and
> have been pushing this one out to scikits.umfpack.
>> I would put the code in BSD, just to make it clear that people are
>> welcomed to derive work for the code in BSD license, but I would make it
>> clear that the package itself is contaminated.
> I'd probably go the other way. Make it GPLed, but add a note that you
> will relicense your parts of the code on request. Having wrappers with
> a different license than the library itself is usually just confusing
> for very little benefit. The code in the wrapper itself is usually not
> very interesting.
> --
> Robert Kern
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
>  -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev


More information about the Scipy-dev mailing list