[SciPy-Dev] preparing for scipy 0.8 release
Sun Apr 25 10:09:47 CDT 2010
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:39 PM, David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
> On Sunday, April 25, 2010, <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Gael Varoquaux
> > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:17:49PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> >>> If people think making scipy 0.8.0 python 3.x worths it, it is doable
> >>> in a short amount of time (that is it won't postpone scipy 0.8.0
> >>> release).
> >>> > - Time line: do we want a release before SciPy2010 (end of June)? If
> >>> > there's only a month left before a freeze.
> >>> I think this is a good timeline. There has been a lot of new features
> >>> in scipy, some quite useful (stats, sparse SVD, etc...).
> > especially also signal (Warren has been very active)
> >> That last line makes me think that it would be great if it could depend
> >> on numpy 1.4 rather than numpy 2.
> > Is it possible to release scipy 0.8 for numpy 1.4, and right after a
> > scipy 0.9 for numpy 2.0 with the python 3 code merged in ?
> It is of course possible. But it would mean tha scipy compatible With
> python 3 would come much later, at least at the current pace (1
> release per year)
> That pace will go up a bit I hope. If you think that python 3 support could
be added before June, then it's also possible to do a release without it in
June, and then 0.9 with it in August or September.
Even without new features, I think doing two releases (0.8 <-> 1.4.1 and 0.9
<-> 2.0) is useful. Otherwise there will probably a lot of people who can't
go to 2.0 yet because they need other libraries/programs that depend on
numpy 1.4.1, and therefore are stuck with scipy 0.7.2.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-Dev