[SciPy-dev] Latex and docstrings

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Fri Feb 19 00:16:42 CST 2010

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:10 AM,  <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:34 PM, David Cournapeau <david@silveregg.co.jp> wrote:
>> josef.pktd@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Before all the nice Latex disappears, can we rescue it and start a fft
>>> tutorial page in scipy with the collection of all the formulas that
>>> are currently in the docstrings?
>> I never suggested to remove the latex from the doc, only from the
>> docstring. I agree rendered latex is better than ASCII when put in the
>> scipy.fftpack doc (or tutorial) - I did not know how to do it, that's
>> why I did not remove the latex for now.
> Almost none of the scipy sub packages has module level docs, for most
> it's just at most a few paragraphs and then the list of routines.
> The tutorials are a mixture of definitions, background material and
> examples, e.g. linalg and signal contain mostly definitions and
> explanations.
> I created a stub tutorial page for fftpack,
> http://docs.scipy.org/scipy/docs/scipy-docs/tutorial/fftpack.rst/
> and copied the last correct latex version for dct.
> I latex math doesn't render, so I changed the first two equations to
> the same pattern as the equations are in the signal tutorial which
> works. I also copied the first paragraph from the numpy fft module
> description.,
> Also I'm not sure what the section structure should be, but it's setup
> for anyone to correct and add information.

And I haven't linked it yet from the tutorial front page, so will not
yet be included in the docs (as long as it's mostly a stub page)
> Josef
>> cheers,
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev

More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list