[SciPy-Dev] Recent changes to scipy stats
Tue Jun 1 03:54:20 CDT 2010
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Travis Oliphant <email@example.com>wrote:
> > IMO, the problem - in general, not just w/ any one person - is not the
> particulars of what's been done, but the attitude, when it's exhibited by an
> individual, any individual, that the rules may be disregarded when that
> individual, any individual, unilaterally and spontaneously decides those
> rules are inconvenient. The rules are there for very good reasons;
> paraphrasing a recent set of statements by Robert K.:
> What is the rule that has been broken exactly?
Good point: I've been led to believe that there's a "rule" (aka "policy")
against checking-in code that doesn't include passing unit tests and a
Standard-compliant docstring, but I must concede that I can't say *where*
(other than on the listserv) *any* rules are recorded, so if I am mistaken -
if there is in fact no such rule/policy - I apologize, I guess we are all
(or at least all those w/ commit privilege) free to commit as it suits our
> I'd really like to know what people are actually annoyed by and who exactly
> is annoyed?
Great, I'd like to know who *isn't* annoyed.
> Perhaps my confidence with committing to trunk is what is fundamentally the
> issue. It's clear that some people prefer a different process and perhaps
> the move to a distributed version control will help things.
> I do feel a certain confidence with code that I have written and I like to
> get changes into trunk quickly. That has always been my style. I don't
> think I have changed in this regard. Perhaps it is seen as brazen or
> inconsiderate, but I don't see it that way. I actually think it very
> inconsiderate that I should be treated with such rudeness for contributing
> needed functionality.
> Sometimes rules become rules inappropriately. Why should one development
> process hold sway over another? Who is right? Well, clearly, it's just a
> matter of the people around and what they want to see. If the majority
> here want to see a different process, then that's where we will go. But, to
> really do it, we will need to move to a distributed version control process,
> I think --- or at least I will need to. I will try to work on that when I
> can find the motivation.
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty
set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.
Hope: noun, that delusive spirit which escaped Pandora's jar and, with her
lies, prevents mankind from committing a general suicide. (As interpreted
by Robert Graves)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-Dev