[SciPy-user] Renaming scipy_core: here we go again

Christian Meesters meesters at uni-mainz.de
Wed Jan 4 01:58:12 CST 2006

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 08:39, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> > Why not
> > scipy (was scipy-core)
> > and
> > scipy++ (was scipy-svn)?
> >
> >
> > Those names are less obscure than the ones proposed and people may guess
> > there is a base package and an extension package.
> import scipy++
> is not valid python.
> Cheers,
> f

Good point. But 'import scipyplus' or 'import scipy_plus' would be valid 
At least in MHO Gerard's suggestion is finally something creative and 
descriptive. (Whereas my solution is not that good anymore, but perhaps 
someone of you still knows a way out?)

@Travis: Despite of the naming confusions. Thank you and keep up the good 


More information about the SciPy-user mailing list