[SciPy-user] GCC 3.3 requirement
mfmorss at aep.com
Fri Mar 10 14:15:59 CST 2006
Exactly, but even for compiling C code, gcc-4.0 is less trustworthy.
The last verson of gcc that was produced before gcc-4.0 was, if I'm not
mistaken, gcc-3.4.5. Not gcc-3.3. I would recommend gcc-3.4.5 for
building anything, not just numpy and scipy. I was surprised to learn here
that gcc-4.0 is shipped with SuSE.
Also unless I'm mistaken, there is no need to use a Fortran compiler more
advanced than g77 to compile the math libs, which are written in Fortran
I don't really see any problem with not being able or willing to use more
recent versions of gcc, since for the time being, the older version is more
stable. Gcc-3.4.5 (including g77) isn't going to go away, and if you don't
have it, it's not a huge problem to build it. My belief is that the
compiled distributions of Linux, for example, still all use gcc-3. I
notice, for example, that Gentoo does not mark gcc-4 "stable" for a build
on any system (http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gcc). And Lunar
is still based on 3.4.5.
Mark F. Morss
Principal Analyst, Market Risk
American Electric Power
<humufr at yahoo.fr>
Sent by: To
scipy-user-bounce SciPy Users List
s at scipy.net <scipy-user at scipy.net>
03/10/2006 01:53 Subject
PM Re: [SciPy-user] GCC 3.3
Please respond to
SciPy Users List
<scipy-user at scipy
One big problem with gcc4, especially 4.0 is that gfortran is buggy. A
lot of improvement has been done but in compariason with commercial
compiler or g95, it's not the same things. gfortran is an alpha version
of a true fortran 90 compilers. So many things in scipy are using
fortran so this is a critical issue for the moment.
Robert Hetland wrote:
> Apple shipped a crippled version of GCC 3.3 with the new intel Macs.
> (It seems like it is there -- there is a package, and you can
> gcc_select it -- but it does not work properly.)
> Many on this list have discouraged using 4.0 for building scipy. I
> have also found that 3.3 works on the *PPC* Mac, where 4.0 does not.
> However, it seems inevitable that mac users will need to compile with
> 4.0 as more users get new Intel based machines. I am sure that
> eventually someone will provide an unofficial gcc 3.3 package (like
> Guarav Khanna who maintains hpc.sf.net), but I don't think this is a
> good long-term solution.
> What are the issues involved? Why do we need gcc 3.3? Is there some
> sort of timescale for moving the code base up to GCC 4.0 (or 4.x)
> Rob Hetland, Assistant Professor
> Dept of Oceanography, Texas A&M University
> p: 979-458-0096, f: 979-845-6331
> e: hetland at tamu.edu, w: http://pong.tamu.edu
> SciPy-user mailing list
> SciPy-user at scipy.net
SciPy-user mailing list
SciPy-user at scipy.net
More information about the SciPy-user