[SciPy-user] The IO library and image file formats -- compare with with PIL
Fri Apr 18 06:42:19 CDT 2008
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 18/04/2008, Sebastian Haase <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The reason I'm asking now, is that I just submitted a patch to PIL
> > that adds writing capabilities for MultiPage TIFF files.
> > I did not get any response on the PIL list,
> If you *do* figure out how to get their attention, please let me know
> (maybe I should try the route Robert suggested). Zachary Pincus
> (IIRC) and myself both have patches we'd like to have applied. We
> mailed it to the Image SIG, without any response.
Ultimately we has to consider a fork of PIL.
Do you guys know, if this is allowed -- per the PIL license !?
Of course this would be super sub optimal,
but then, it's effectively what I have right now -- and you have your
own version .....
To summerize: numpy can probably do many things of PIL already better
-- I'm talking about all the transformation stuff of course.
So only the file IO would have to get forked out -- to scipy for example ;-)
More information about the SciPy-user