[SciPy-User] How to do symmetry detection?
josef.pktd@gmai...
josef.pktd@gmai...
Wed Jan 20 09:47:40 CST 2010
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:43 AM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:20 AM, iCy-fLaME <icy.flame.gm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some signals in mirror pairs in an 1D/2D array, and I am trying
>> to identify the symmetry axis.
>>
>> A simplified example of the signal pair can look like this:
>> [0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 3, 2, 0]
>>
>> The ideal output in this case will probably be:
>> [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
>>
>> As long as the symmetry point has the largest value, it will be fine.
>>
>> There can be multiple pairs of signals in the array, and the length of
>> separation and duration of the signal can vary from pair to pair. The
>> overall length of the array is about 1k points. The output array
>> should reflect the level of likeness between the two sides of the
>> array.
>>
>> I tried doing a loop as follows:
>>
>> ############ Begin ############
>> from numpy import array
>> from numpy import zeros
>> from numpy import arange
>>
>> data = array([0,0,0,0,2,3,4,0,0,0,4,3,2,0])
>> length = len(data)
>> result = zeros(length)
>>
>> left = arange(length)
>> left[0] = 0 # Index to be used for the end of the left portion
>>
>> right = arange(length) + 1
>> right[-1] = length - 1 # Index to be used for the begining of the
>> right hand portion
>>
>> for i in range(length):
>> l_part = zeros(length) # Default values to be zero, so
>> non-overlapping region will
>> r_part = zeros(length) # return zero after the multiplication.
>>
>> l_part[:left[i]] = data[:left[i]][::-1] # Take the left hand
>> side and mirror it
>> r_part[:length-right[i]] = data[right[i]:] # Take the right hand side
>> result[i] = sum(l_part*r_part)/length # Use the product and
>> integral to find the similarity metric.
>>
>> print l_part
>> print r_part
>> print "===============================", result[i]
>>
>>
>> print result
>>
>>
>> ############ END ############
>>
>>
>> But it is rather slow for a 1000x1000 2D array, anyone got any
>> suggestion for a more elegant solution?
>
>
> not as general and flexible but fast
>
>>>> a=np.array([0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 3, 2, 0])
>>>> kw = [-1.,-1,-1,0,1,1,1]
>
>>>> (signal.convolve(a,kw,'valid')==0).astype(int)
> array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0])
>
> convolve can handle also nd
>
> One idea might be to use something like this in a first round, and use
> the more correct loop solution only if there are several shorter
> mirrors found by convolve. Also a guess on the likely length might
> improve the choice of window.
> Distance measure is additive not multiplicative.
or maybe this is not a great idea. if you have integers, there might
be many cancellations and wrong detections.
Josef
> Josef
>
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-User mailing list
>> SciPy-User@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>>
>
More information about the SciPy-User
mailing list