[SciPy-User] scipy.optimize named argument inconsistency

Denis Laxalde denis.laxalde@mcgill...
Wed Sep 14 14:45:06 CDT 2011

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:30:14 -0400,
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:08:22 +0200,
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Could you make an overview of which functions should be changed, and your
> > proposed new unified interface? The best solution could depend on the
> > details of the changed needed.  
> The first thing to do is to improve names consistency, imo. I will
> review all functions of the package and then post a list of possible
> improvements. Then, I need to think a bit more about the new « unified
> interfaces » idea as it could indeed solve some issues. As
> suggested, I'll create a page on <http://projects.scipy.org/scipy> when
> things will be more clear.

I've drafted a proposal for improvements that I would like to discuss.
Initially, I planned to post it on the dev wiki but I cannot edit
anything there. Is any restriction for editing?
(Also, is it the right list for this discussion or should I continue
on -dev?)


More information about the SciPy-User mailing list