[SciPy-User] [SciPy-user] Covariance matrix
Wed Feb 15 10:42:30 CST 2012
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:36 AM, suzana8447 <email@example.com> wrote:
> Thanks all for your help.
> What I have understood is that I get what so called the cov_x from least
> square root fit and then multipy this matrix by the error variance.
> I have two more questions.
> 1) What is meant by the error variance? How one can extract it?
> 2) Do you mean by ||err||= func-data?
(func-data).sum() / (n-k)
squared sum of it an divided by number of observations minus number of
parameters, as Chuck mentioned
source of curve_fit is useful
IIRC, infodict 'fvec' returns the squared error sum
> Thanks in advance.
> Charles R Harris wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:56 AM, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Kevin Gullikson
>>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> > Use full_output=True when you call leastq, and you will get a matrix
>>> > other things). If you multiply that matrix by the standard deviation of
>>> > residuals, it will be the covariance matrix.
>>> As Charles pointed out, multiply by the error variance not the
>>> standard deviation. Docstring is wrong in this.
>> Even more precisely, multiply by ||err||^2/(n - dof), since it is possible
>> that the error has an offset unless the model can perfectly fit a
>> If this actually makes a difference, the model is inadequate, but the
>> variance estimate might be useful if you are using something like the
>> Akaike information criterion to choose the number of parameters.
>> SciPy-User mailing list
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Covariance-matrix-tp33301423p33328834.html
> Sent from the Scipy-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> SciPy-User mailing list
More information about the SciPy-User