[SciPy-User] Contributing to SciPy was Re: Least-squares fittings with bounds: why is scipy not up to the task?
Sat Mar 10 12:32:47 CST 2012
10.03.2012 19:16, firstname.lastname@example.org kirjoitti:
> I think it would be useful to have a central location for publishing
> code and get earlier feedback from users. (Currently I bookmark, for
> example, gists or modules in a random package, that look interesting
> and I might not find again when I need them in future.)
> I'm still envious of the matlab fileexchange with a very useful
> commenting system where I look more often than at scipy-central, and I
> like the commenting system on stackoverflow that gives a much faster
> way of evaluating several ways of doing things.
> I also think Mathworks and Statacorp are very smart in supporting user
> code, since (I assume) that they look at the download statistic to see
> what is in high demand and might incorporate code if it's license
I think this is pretty much the position scipy-central tries to fill. As
far as I understand, what you say that is missing is
- more advertisement
- comment system
The former can be fixed. The latter requires someone to sit down and
think how to implement it --- but it shouldn't be too difficult, as the
app  is written with Django and seems pretty easy to work on. If
someone familiar with web applications wants to give a hand here, this
would be an opportunity to contribute.
More information about the SciPy-User