[SciPy-User] Naming Ideas
Wed Sep 5 10:52:01 CDT 2012
On 05/09/2012 15:05, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Kluyver <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Sciome - from the numfocus proposal (potential confusion with sciome.com)
>> PyScis - pronounced like pisces (potential confusion with PySCeS and
>> PySci, two unrelated Python projects)
>> List subscribers, what do you think? Does one of those names feel
>> right to refer to the scipy/numpy/etc. stack? Would you like to rule
>> any out? Or can you think of a better name yourself?
> I said something similar in the numfocus thread, but I'll throw it out again:
> The only name that people seem to actually like for this is "PyLab".
PyLab is a nice, clear, memorable name, but I feel like it's a bad fit
for what is being suggested because it brings to mind Matlab, and, at
least to me, suggests that we're just playing catch-up with that. The
existing pylab in matplotlib is well named, because it is more or less
providing a matlab replacement, but if we want to refer to the whole
numpy/scipy/etc. ecosystem, which I believe aspires to be much more than
just a free version of Matlab, shouldn't we be more ambitious and
self-confident in the name?
That said I have no good ideas. From the list above, Sciome is the
nicest but the name clash makes it a bit risky I think.
Is the idea that the ecosystem should be focused on scientific
computation only? I thought that there was a push for more general high
performance computational stuff?
Some vague ideas, none of which are very good:
- Sciosphere (I like the use of the word 'sphere' to represent an
ecosystem, like biosphere, unfortunately already exists as well as not
being very catchy)
- SciGnosis, PyGnosis, etc., i.e. using gnosis (knowledge), although
pygnosis is a bit close to psygnosis the computer game company, and
maybe gnosis has too much religious connotation?
Whatever is chosen, it should be easily Googlable returning preferably
More information about the SciPy-User