[SciPy-User] Pylab - standard packages
Fri Sep 21 15:42:27 CDT 2012
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ralf Gommers <email@example.com> wrote:
> The point of that remark was that we shouldn't set requirements that will
> say "Python(x,y) / Spyder isn't compliant", nothing more than that.
Actually, we *should* define something that is almost certainly *not*
met by today's versions of epd/pythonxy/anaconda/sage/whatever. If we
don't, the logical implication is that we'll be defining the minimum
common denominator of all of them, and that would be way wrong.
What we need to find is a bar that all these projects can clear in a
reasonable time-frame (say 6 months, give or take) and without undue
burden on their development resources. But not bury the bar
underground so that everyone has already cleared it where they're
More information about the SciPy-User