[SciPy-User] Pylab - standard packages

Thomas Kluyver takowl@gmail....
Sat Sep 22 06:15:23 CDT 2012

On 22 September 2012 11:55, Almar Klein <a.klein@science-applied.nl> wrote:
> That's how I see it too. Thanks for wording it more clearly. So I think
> we're converging towards an agreement. I don't know enough about the
> notebook to decide whether it should be included now or later. I go with
> whatever you guys think is best.

Thanks Almar. I think it would be nice to write tutorials around
something a bit more advanced and more friendly than a terminal
interface, but I can also see the argument that it's not quite mature
enough to put in a standard yet. So I put it to the community.

To get a better overview, I've made a poll. By all means express your
opinions here as well, but please go and vote on whether or not to
require IPython notebook now:



More information about the SciPy-User mailing list